<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The End of Email Predicted, Wrong as Usual</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.emailserviceguide.com/2009/10/the-end-of-email-predicted-wrong-as-usual/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.emailserviceguide.com/2009/10/the-end-of-email-predicted-wrong-as-usual/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 14:54:19 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: L&#8217;email n&#8217;est pas mort, l&#8217;email change&#8230; &#171; le webmarketing de Gwenola Toulemonde</title>
		<link>http://www.emailserviceguide.com/2009/10/the-end-of-email-predicted-wrong-as-usual/comment-page-1/#comment-65</link>
		<dc:creator>L&#8217;email n&#8217;est pas mort, l&#8217;email change&#8230; &#171; le webmarketing de Gwenola Toulemonde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 17:15:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emailserviceguide.com/?p=734#comment-65</guid>
		<description>[...] The End of Email Predicted, Wrong as Usual par Alexander Ljungberg, Email Service Guide [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The End of Email Predicted, Wrong as Usual par Alexander Ljungberg, Email Service Guide [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: twitter和Facebook会取代电子邮件？ &#124; 52.bingcheng</title>
		<link>http://www.emailserviceguide.com/2009/10/the-end-of-email-predicted-wrong-as-usual/comment-page-1/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>twitter和Facebook会取代电子邮件？ &#124; 52.bingcheng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 10:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emailserviceguide.com/?p=734#comment-40</guid>
		<description>[...] 不过Email Service Guide指出，Facebook and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 不过Email Service Guide指出，Facebook and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 又有人宣称电子邮件将死 &#171; 每日IT新闻，最新IT资讯，聚合多站点消息，保证你与世界同步</title>
		<link>http://www.emailserviceguide.com/2009/10/the-end-of-email-predicted-wrong-as-usual/comment-page-1/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>又有人宣称电子邮件将死 &#171; 每日IT新闻，最新IT资讯，聚合多站点消息，保证你与世界同步</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 03:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emailserviceguide.com/?p=734#comment-39</guid>
		<description>[...] Service Guide指出，Facebook and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Service Guide指出，Facebook and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobby B</title>
		<link>http://www.emailserviceguide.com/2009/10/the-end-of-email-predicted-wrong-as-usual/comment-page-1/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobby B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 22:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emailserviceguide.com/?p=734#comment-38</guid>
		<description>Very good comment.  I read the article in the WSJ and had the same thoughts.  Email is a useful business tool and is a confidential trackable information transfer technology.  I think the guys at the Wall Street Journal are not very advanced technology wise.  For example they still have the same guy (Mossberg) yakking on about how Linux is not ready for prime time, we use it extensively at home and in our business, as do millions of other people.  I thin WSJ needs to stick to business and let other people write about technology.   BB</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good comment.  I read the article in the WSJ and had the same thoughts.  Email is a useful business tool and is a confidential trackable information transfer technology.  I think the guys at the Wall Street Journal are not very advanced technology wise.  For example they still have the same guy (Mossberg) yakking on about how Linux is not ready for prime time, we use it extensively at home and in our business, as do millions of other people.  I thin WSJ needs to stick to business and let other people write about technology.   BB</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Email Death Link Dump &#171; michael-mccracken.net</title>
		<link>http://www.emailserviceguide.com/2009/10/the-end-of-email-predicted-wrong-as-usual/comment-page-1/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Email Death Link Dump &#171; michael-mccracken.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 17:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emailserviceguide.com/?p=734#comment-37</guid>
		<description>[...] misunderstanding the article, but providing some interesting info. Here&#8217;s a few of them. Both The End of Email Predicted, Wrong as Usual, from emailserviceguide.com, and Why Twitter and Facebook Will Never Kill E-mail from the technomix [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] misunderstanding the article, but providing some interesting info. Here&#8217;s a few of them. Both The End of Email Predicted, Wrong as Usual, from emailserviceguide.com, and Why Twitter and Facebook Will Never Kill E-mail from the technomix [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Email Service Guide – The End of Email Predicted, Wrong as Usual -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.emailserviceguide.com/2009/10/the-end-of-email-predicted-wrong-as-usual/comment-page-1/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Email Service Guide – The End of Email Predicted, Wrong as Usual -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 12:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emailserviceguide.com/?p=734#comment-34</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Timo Schoeler, Email Service Guide. Email Service Guide said: WSJ argues that email is dead. We think that&#039;s an absurd argument. This is why: http://bit.ly/9jyoN #email #wsj [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Timo Schoeler, Email Service Guide. Email Service Guide said: WSJ argues that email is dead. We think that&#39;s an absurd argument. This is why: <a href="http://bit.ly/9jyoN" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/9jyoN</a> #email #wsj [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Email is dead&#8230; at Word to the Wise</title>
		<link>http://www.emailserviceguide.com/2009/10/the-end-of-email-predicted-wrong-as-usual/comment-page-1/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>Email is dead&#8230; at Word to the Wise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 23:06:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emailserviceguide.com/?p=734#comment-33</guid>
		<description>[...] Email Service Guide points out other significant differences between social networking and email. Email is used to contact people other than our friends, to talk about more than what we did for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Email Service Guide points out other significant differences between social networking and email. Email is used to contact people other than our friends, to talk about more than what we did for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
