<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why The Heck Are People Still Using POP3?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.emailserviceguide.com/2009/10/why-the-heck-are-people-still-using-pop3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.emailserviceguide.com/2009/10/why-the-heck-are-people-still-using-pop3/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 04:09:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://www.emailserviceguide.com/2009/10/why-the-heck-are-people-still-using-pop3/comment-page-1/#comment-82</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 16:12:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emailserviceguide.com/?p=743#comment-82</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by vpetersson: Why the heck are people still using POP3? http://bit.ly/EWuV1 #pop3 #imap #why...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by vpetersson: Why the heck are people still using POP3? <a href="http://bit.ly/EWuV1" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/EWuV1</a> #pop3 #imap #why&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander Ljungberg</title>
		<link>http://www.emailserviceguide.com/2009/10/why-the-heck-are-people-still-using-pop3/comment-page-1/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander Ljungberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 00:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emailserviceguide.com/?p=743#comment-49</guid>
		<description>From a privacy point of view I tend to think that if you don&#039;t trust the server you have the email on, you&#039;re in trouble regardless. They can choose to store your email, POP or no POP. Encrypted email is what you need at that point (PGP, GPG).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From a privacy point of view I tend to think that if you don&#8217;t trust the server you have the email on, you&#8217;re in trouble regardless. They can choose to store your email, POP or no POP. Encrypted email is what you need at that point (PGP, GPG).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Viktor Petersson</title>
		<link>http://www.emailserviceguide.com/2009/10/why-the-heck-are-people-still-using-pop3/comment-page-1/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>Viktor Petersson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 19:48:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emailserviceguide.com/?p=743#comment-48</guid>
		<description>Murple,

You do bring up a valid point, POP3 is good from a privacy point of view.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Murple,</p>
<p>You do bring up a valid point, POP3 is good from a privacy point of view.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Murple</title>
		<link>http://www.emailserviceguide.com/2009/10/why-the-heck-are-people-still-using-pop3/comment-page-1/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>Murple</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 15:24:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emailserviceguide.com/?p=743#comment-47</guid>
		<description>I use POP3 precisely because IMAP was designed to keep emails on the server. I do NOT want my private emails sitting on someone else&#039;s machine any longer than it has to. I want them on my computer where I can be assured of privacy and know that backups and availability are not in the hands of someone else who may or may not be doing a good job of it. Considering how cheap disk space is now, there&#039;s no reason not to keep your email. I have almost every email received or sent by me since the mid 1990s, except for removed spam. You&#039;re welcome to your IMAP, but I will never use it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use POP3 precisely because IMAP was designed to keep emails on the server. I do NOT want my private emails sitting on someone else&#8217;s machine any longer than it has to. I want them on my computer where I can be assured of privacy and know that backups and availability are not in the hands of someone else who may or may not be doing a good job of it. Considering how cheap disk space is now, there&#8217;s no reason not to keep your email. I have almost every email received or sent by me since the mid 1990s, except for removed spam. You&#8217;re welcome to your IMAP, but I will never use it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.emailserviceguide.com/2009/10/why-the-heck-are-people-still-using-pop3/comment-page-1/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 19:23:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emailserviceguide.com/?p=743#comment-43</guid>
		<description>Hi,

While I agree that IMAP has greater functionality for those who need to have access to their accounts -- and all available folders -- from multiple devices, I (no email power user by any means) can get by using POP and simply setting my email client to &quot;leave message(s) on server.&quot;  Accessing the account on two computers (using Outlook on one and Opera 10&#039;s email client on the other) leaves me with two local copies and one web copy of each email.  Then, when convenient, I login to the my webmail and move the messages to desired folders (or delete them).  I also have all incoming mail autoforwarded to a Google account as further back-up, which account I organize only once per month or so.  So that makes 4 copies.  So back-up and storage is a non-issue for me, i.e. I personally have no need to access my email via IMAP to achieve those goals.

As far as a reason for this choice (of POP over IMAP), I guess it&#039;s because I like the simplicity of a quick download of all mail from the account&#039;s Inbox into my clients&#039; inboxes (using one, global inbox).  No waiting for synchronising + purging or anything.  And I can easily move (to another offline folder) or delete a message in one of my offline clients w/o a second thought (as if it will be similarly moved/deleted if it were an IMAP account).

I know these things don&#039;t prove POP to be better than IMAP.  It&#039;s just that I can achieve -- to my satisfaction -- some of the same desired results w/o the using the more full-featured IMAP.

To each his/her own, I guess.  :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>While I agree that IMAP has greater functionality for those who need to have access to their accounts &#8212; and all available folders &#8212; from multiple devices, I (no email power user by any means) can get by using POP and simply setting my email client to &#8220;leave message(s) on server.&#8221;  Accessing the account on two computers (using Outlook on one and Opera 10&#8242;s email client on the other) leaves me with two local copies and one web copy of each email.  Then, when convenient, I login to the my webmail and move the messages to desired folders (or delete them).  I also have all incoming mail autoforwarded to a Google account as further back-up, which account I organize only once per month or so.  So that makes 4 copies.  So back-up and storage is a non-issue for me, i.e. I personally have no need to access my email via IMAP to achieve those goals.</p>
<p>As far as a reason for this choice (of POP over IMAP), I guess it&#8217;s because I like the simplicity of a quick download of all mail from the account&#8217;s Inbox into my clients&#8217; inboxes (using one, global inbox).  No waiting for synchronising + purging or anything.  And I can easily move (to another offline folder) or delete a message in one of my offline clients w/o a second thought (as if it will be similarly moved/deleted if it were an IMAP account).</p>
<p>I know these things don&#8217;t prove POP to be better than IMAP.  It&#8217;s just that I can achieve &#8212; to my satisfaction &#8212; some of the same desired results w/o the using the more full-featured IMAP.</p>
<p>To each his/her own, I guess.  :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 3/9 queries in 0.007 seconds using apc
Object Caching 293/295 objects using apc

Served from: blog.emailserviceguide.com @ 2012-02-11 06:22:58 -->
